<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>TRANSPORT IMPACTS - All Forums</title>
	<link>http://www.transport-impacts.com/sf-forum/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[To get moving in the right direction]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Forum Version 3.1.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.transport-impacts.com/sf-forum?xfeed=all" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>jacqui on Carbon calculators - what are they calculating</title>
	<link>http://www.transport-impacts.com/sf-forum/energy-consumption-and-emissions/carbon-calculators-what-are-they-calculating/page-1/post-3/#p3</link>
	<category>Energy consumption and emissions</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.transport-impacts.com/sf-forum/energy-consumption-and-emissions/carbon-calculators-what-are-they-calculating/page-1/post-3/#p3</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The good old carbon calculator is&#160;capturing peoples attention, it&#39;s giving people&#160;something tangible to&#160;monitor,  judge their actions by and&#160;possibly change how they&#160;are going&#160;about their&#160;day. &#160;There are a&#160;few problems when it&#160;comes to&#160;transport.&#160;</p>
<p>Firstly, they&#160;are usually&#160;only focusing&#160;on direct emissions, which makes the&#160;transport&#160;sector look less&#160;important (therefore people will be less motivated t change).&#160;&#160;It also&#160;probably&#160;favours car travel more than it should,&#160;as their are tens of billions of dollars associated with this&#160;industry and the&#160;impacts it&#160;causes (many times more than other modes). &#160;All these industries have  associated greenhouse gases  which are indirect emissions for car travel.</p>
<p>Second, the&#160;calculator takes&#160;a snap shot&#160;- what the emissions are currently.&#160;&#160;It is important to look&#160;at&#160;potential&#160;development, because different&#160;modes run&#160;on different power (such as petrol cars vs electric trains), and the&#160;potential to&#160;reduce the&#160;emissions associated with&#160;these&#160;power supplies is very different.&#160;</p>
<p>Thirdly, these calculators need a&#160;way of allocating&#160;responsibility of&#160;emissions for privaely run&#160;vehicles, as&#160;well&#160;as publicly run&#160;transport networks. &#160;Private seems easy enough, because the people using it, are responsible for the type of car they have, the fuel they use, the route they take and how many people are in the car. &#160;As for the public transport user, they have no control over these factors. &#160;A snap shot of current conditions (average ridership etc.) is often used, but this is rarely optimal conditions, and public transport is often misleadingly&#160;seen&#160;as&#160;an&#160;unattractive&#160;way to&#160;reduce&#160;one&#39;s "carbon footprint"</p>
<p>I&#39;m&#160;interested&#160;to have your view and experience with&#160;carbon&#160;calculators.&#160;&#160;Do you take them&#160;as bible, are you skepical, and would it convince you to change your&#160;behaviour?</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:45:41 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Adrian on Cycling infrastructure</title>
	<link>http://www.transport-impacts.com/sf-forum/safe-and-fun-cycling/cycling-infrastructure/page-1/post-2/#p2</link>
	<category>safe and fun cycling </category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.transport-impacts.com/sf-forum/safe-and-fun-cycling/cycling-infrastructure/page-1/post-2/#p2</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jacqui.</p>
<p>I ran a cycling&#160; stall at Macquaire uni today and your sister told me I must check out your website.</p>
<p>For my own thoughts on cycling infrastructure check out a recent blog post:</p>
<p>http://cyclingybr.blogspot.com/2008/07/i-want-to-ride-my-bicycle-draft-paper.html</p>
<p>I also agree that infrastructure is not the FIX, but it doesn&#39;t hurt either. NSW spends less on cycling (per capita) than any other state.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Adrian</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:53:05 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>jacqui on Cycling infrastructure</title>
	<link>http://www.transport-impacts.com/sf-forum/safe-and-fun-cycling/cycling-infrastructure/page-1/post-1/#p1</link>
	<category>safe and fun cycling </category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.transport-impacts.com/sf-forum/safe-and-fun-cycling/cycling-infrastructure/page-1/post-1/#p1</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Cycling infrastructure is often seen as THE FIX.&#160; I have no doubt that it does have an important part to play in the improvement of cycling conditions in Australia but it&#39;s important not to get carried away with a good thing.&#160; Every piece of road (except for freeways where cyclists are forbidden) is actually cycling infrastructure (just as it is driving infrastructure) and it&#39;s important that the community acknowledges this.&#160; While dedicated cycling lanes/paths will always be safer and more pleasant to use - they should not be the only place where cyclists feel at ease.&#160; I think it&#39;s really important that all streets become cycle friendly and that we don&#39;t just funnel cyclists along certain routes so that driver&#39;s don&#39;t have to "worry about them".&#160;</p>
<p>I know that currently Australian roads are unsafe for cyclists and that is why dedicated infrastructure is seen as one of the only solutions, but at the same time I think the culture on our existing road network needs to be targeted.&#160; I&#39;m keen for your views....</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:35:06 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>